🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.