🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.