🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding that remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all love a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive power on each forehand and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it forever if I don’t do it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {